/* Milonic DHTML Website Navigation Menu Version 5, license number 187760 Written by Andy Woolley - Copyright 2003 (c) Milonic Solutions Limited. All Rights Reserved. Please visit http://www.milonic.com/ for more information. */

 

 

Search

 

 

 

עברית

 

عربي

 

Horse Racing — Questions and Answers


 

 

 

 
 

Campaign against the Expansion of Racing in Israel

Experts' Statements about Racing

Questions & Answers about Racing

Demo at Ministry of Culture & Sport

Speech in the Knesset

In the Supreme Court of Israel

Ruling of Chief Rabbi Against Racing

Racing Campaign
Press Releases

Racing Campaign
Media Coverage

Help Stop Expansion of Racing in Israel

 

 


Racing Cruelties:   The Horror Behind the Glamour

Racing Cruelties: Photos & Videos

Slaughter of Racehorses

In Memory of Ruffian

Horse Abuse & Rescue Overview

Premarin Horses

 

 


Slaughter at the Racetrack

Slaughterhouse: Photos

 

 

  1. Horse racing has never been banned anywhere in the world. Why should it be banned in Israel?
     
    First of all, just for the very reason that it is not yet established and that there is not yet an embedded industry that could claim we want to destroy their profit — it's easier to ban now than to fight later. Second, for all the reasons we detail about injury and exploitation. After all, racing elsewhere developed in the days when horses as work animals were common (transportation, field labor) and before exploitation of animals was recognized as inherently cruel. This is a different world: the Bundestag in Germany has recognized that animals have inherent rights; the EU recognizes the five basic freedoms of animals that protect their welfare. Since Israel is already free of this cruelty, why allow it to develop when it really is only for the benefit of a few developers and at the cost of animals and weak gamblers.
     
  2. Israel is a smaller country than England and the U.S. It will be easier for veterinarians to supervise whatís going on.
     
    The problems we outlined in our petition to the Court were found in every country where horse racing exists, even in the small country of Macau, where 300 young horses are lined up and shot in the head, one after the other.
     
    Veterinarians wonít speak out against an industry that provides them with a livelihood, but veterinarians outside the industry have told the truth. Two of our experts are equine veterinarians. The top California race track veterinarian left the industry a few years ago, saying veterinarians are pressured by owners to give drugs against the best interests of the horses. They have no choice if they want to earn a living, because if one veterinarian refuses to give drugs, owners will just find another who will.
     
  3. Regulating the industry will be enough to protect the horses.
     
    Regulations have never worked in any country where they have been tried. Drugs given to horses are undetectable, stewards at races donít stop jockeys from cruelly whipping horses, crimes go unpunished, jockeys are bribed, races are fixed, and horses are killed to collect the insurance money. This has all been documented in media articles and police reports.
     
  4. Horses love to run. Itís natural.
     
    In nature, horses run in spurts for short distances and then rest. They arenít pressured to run beyond their limits, for long distances, and they donít have to endure grueling training regimens at the age of 1Ĺ or 2. The pressure of racing is unnatural and it causes horses to bleed in the lungs, sustain catastrophic injuries, or collapse and die of sudden death from a heart attack or from catastrophic musculoskeletal injuries.
     
  5. Veterinarians know how to treat these conditions and others. Why would people who spend a lot of money on horses and who want them to win races not take good care of them?
     
    As one racing official said, race horses are like a lottery ticket. If it isnít a winning ticket, or when youíre done with it, you rip it up and throw it away. Horses are being bred all the time to race. They train at 2 or even younger; those fast enough are entered in the big money races at 3 years old; and a few years later, if they donít break down in training or on the track, their careers are finished. Even the big prize winners have been found in slaughterhouses or left to starve to death in a paddock somewhere. Horses are insured, so if they break down, owners often prefer to euthanize them rather than pay for expensive surgeries that may not get them back on the track. Instead, they look to next yearís crop. The same number of horses enter horse racing each year as leave.
     

    Top

     

  6. The conditions you mention (chronic ulcers, bleeding in the lungs, heart conditions) can all be prevented or treated. Treatments are getting better every year:

  Thereís a paste that's effective in treating chronic ulcers.

  Horses who bleed in the lungs can be taken out of the race.

  Some studies say human athletes get heart murmurs, too, and it doesnít affect their performance or their lifespan. Few horses die of heart attacks on the track.

Chronic ulcers are a pathological, unnatural condition, the result of the unnatural life of a race horse. Medicine just masks the symptoms, it doesnít cure the underlying problem. The fact that the ulcers go away when horses stop training and racing shows that the training and racing are the problem. Would you advise someone to keep taking medicine for a medical condition, but not stop the behavior that is the cause of the condition?
 
Horses can die suddenly while racing from bleeding in the lungs. Drugs given to prevent this condition have been shown to be ineffective. Many studies say that most or even all horses experience bleeding in the lungs after the excessive, unnatural exertion of racing.
 
Studies show that heart murmurs increase dramatically after months of training and racing. Horses can experience sudden death from heart attacks in training or on the track. Why should any horse be pushed beyond his or her limit, even to their death, for greed?

  1. A recent study shows that training a horse young is good for the horse. Exercise builds strong bones. And the study shows that training at 2 rather than later does not shorten their racing career.
     
    That study was funded by the racing industry, to justify training horses at a young age. They must train them so young so they can compete in the big money 2- and 3-year-old races. If they win one of the big races, the classics, then owners can earn very high stud fees because people want the fastest horse to sire or give birth to their next race horse. Prize money is hard to win. Stud fees are what owners are interested in, for the large profit. Theyíll lose the chance to get this money if they donít train their horses at 2.
     
    The fact is that yes, exercise builds bones, but it doesnít do anything for the joints, ligaments, cartilage, and tendons Ė and thatís where horses have severe problems. Horses are increasingly bred to have lighter frames (which are less sturdy) and long, thin legs for speed — these characteristics make them easily susceptible to injury.
     
    And the reality on the track shows that the study is wrong. Even the fastest horses in Europe broke down on the track. Just three examples:

  One Cool Cat, sired by Storm Cat, the top sire in the world, was the fastest horse in the European racing world at 2, but he was worn out by the time he was entered in the classics at 3. He sustained a lot of injuries during the races, and didnít perform well.

  American Post, the top French horse, was fast at 2, finished at 3.

  Denebola, at 2, was the top female horse in Europe in 2003, but had to be retired the next year.

The strongest, fittest, fastest cannot take such intense training schedules and they donít make it to the next season. They are retired, and disposed of, as babies.
 
While in the past, horses used to be developed slowly and because of that they had much longer racing careers, nowadays, there is a rush to get them to stud as soon as possible. Owners must start serious race training very young so they can tell which ones will be able to perform well on the track at the classic races. The industry will do anything it can to justify starting horses as young as 2. So the industry-commissioned research is questionable because it is biased to support the financial interest of the industry and does not represent the reality on the track.

Top

 

  1. What you say about so many being slaughtered wonít be true in Israel. We can sell these horses abroad as pets, or for riding. We can ask the racing industry to put up some money to provide for their retirement.
     
    Thoroughbreds have hot temperaments. They donít necessarily make good pets or riding horses. The conditions at the average riding facility in Israel are not good, either. There will be thousands of horses without thousands of places willing to take them. This has been shown to be true in every other country. The American Association of Equine Practitioners considers the very large number of abandoned, abused, and neglected horses, including ex-race horses, its biggest problem and priority.
     
    The industry has rarely given significant amounts of money for retired race horses without a fight. An example of an attempt in the United States to address this problem from within the industry is the horse retirement program endowed by wealthy breeders and stables and managed by the Thoroughbred Racing Foundation. This well-funded project is responsible for over a thousand horses, but in 2011 a large proportion of them were discovered to be suffering neglect Ė many had to be euthanized. Reported by The New York Times, 2011: Full Story.

    The small amount the industry gives in England provides for few horses, and retirement facilities are forced to turn away horses every day. Most are sent to slaughter. Does Israel want to go into the business of slaughtering thousands of horses every year, or into the cruel live transport business, which is being attacked by animal groups worldwide?
      
  2. The next thing you will say is that youíre against riding horses and they should all just be left to run around in fields. Horses are working animals, bred for this purpose. They have to earn their keep.
     
    If so many werenít bred every year for racing, the problem wouldnít exist. We donít have the right to exploit them this way.
      
  3. The number dying on tracks is only around 1%.
     
    Thatís a lot of horses. According to a study by Animal Aid, 375 horses were reported to have died on the track in England in one year, but the real number is probably much higher. The British Jockey Club refuses to release complete information. In the U.S., Sports Illustrated magazine said that in 1992 (the latest year for which they reported a total) 3,566 horses broke down either in morning workouts or on the track and had to be euthanized, one breakdown for every 22 races. If that many people died from a sport, the sport would end. The number disposed of prematurely is closer to 100%. Even in rich, western societies like the U.S., Canada, the U.K., and France where grazing land is available, racehorses are rarely retired. Only a very small fraction of them are able to live out their lives as breeding horses, and only a small percentage are placed into private hands for a reprieve for a few years. In the final analysis, almost all horses entering the racing industry are slaughtered for one reason or another before they are 6 years old.
      
  4. There is terrible abuse of horses in Israel. The racing industry will bring more money into Israel and this will mean more money to take care of the horses and for research.
     
    Despite the large profits earned from treating race horses like commodities, it was not until 2000 that the British Race Horsing Board — in the face of mounting criticism — set up a scheme to provide funds for retired horses. Since then, it has made much of its project, Rehabilitation of Racehorses (RoR). Yet in fact, the amount donated is only a token sum compared to the profits earned by the three major bookmakers, and far too little to solve the extensive problem. Carrie Humble, who runs a rehabilitation centre in Lancashire for Thoroughbreds, told The Guardian newspaper in 2002 that she is still forced to raise more than 70% of the funding she needs herself, and turns away two or three horses every day. "It's getting worse, not better." she said.

Top